Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nicholas Smith's avatar

Thanks for sharing your work. I wonder why this fundamental idea—panentheism—and God beyond an Aristotelian framework, for God as St Maximus argues in his first century on theology, God cannot fit into the frame of Aristotle—he is beyond origin, intermediate state (motion), and actuality while—through his self giving through his energies he is the state of actulization of all that comes into being. He is beyond being yet his ecstasy of himself as the logoi and energies allow for participation in God and eventual identification with God without collapsing man into God or God into man in essence or numerical identity. Essentials it’s the the only manner I think to preserve otherness and yet complete identity with. I think of it as a both / and logic.

Expand full comment
Tomer Solomon's avatar

Hi Jeremiah - congrats on all the good news! Fascinating premise on Orthodoxy and Panentheism. Look forward to taking a closer look at your paper.

Have you taken a look at Andrew Jackson's work on bridging evolutionary biology and St. Maximus' logoi? Link here - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/zygo.12885

It too posits an "incarnational panentheism" that I find compelling. Would be curious to get your thoughts when you have time to digest!

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts