Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jonathan Jacobson's avatar

As a college student I was trained to use the Four Spiritual Laws in evangelism, and even then I felt uncomfortable with it, as it struck me as the sort of sales pitch an insurance salesman would use. I don’t think we should feel bad if we are reluctant to reduce the Gospel to a sound bite, a commercial, or a 30-second elevator pitch. In some way, feeling bad about our inability to condense God’s truth in that way shows we are still subject to the influence of Protestant reductionism.

That said, of all the things in the Orthodox Church, the one that to me provides a clear headline to the Gospel is the Paschal Troparion: “Christ is risen from the dead, trampling down death by death, and upon those in the tombs bestowing life!” Further details of the Gospel need to not merely be read or spoken but actually experienced within the life of the Holy Spirit in the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church.

James Murnau's avatar

I don't have a good definition of "the Gospel," other than to point out that if the standard evangelical Protestant definition is correct, then the "Gospels" themselves are abject failures, or at least chronically off-topic. Moreover, salvation as "assent to a particular definition of salvation" (which is what the standard American Protestant "gospel message" really is) strikes me as basically a form of works-righteousness in disguise, only the effort becomes intellectual instead of moral. It's still a form of saving yourself, at least according to Protestant logic.

16 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?